Saidatur Rohmah E72211038
Comparative faith / B / one
1. make a case for the definition of Epistemology, Ontology, and Axiology. in line with your opinion primarily based on the philosophical literature that you simply learned?
Etymologically, the term "epistemology" could be a compound word in Greek, particularly episteme and logos. Episteme that means information, whereas logos suggests that systematic information or science. Thus, epistemology will be interpreted as a basic and systematic pondering information. whereas the terminology, epistemology is that the philosophy of science to question the supply, origin, and range, and also the validity and reliability (reability) of the varied claims to information. as an example within the philosophy of the birth of such flows skepticism, dogmatism, relativism, and realism. which became the muse at the amount of epistemology is that the method that permits a information of logic, ethics, aesthetics, and also the procedure the way to get scientific truth, ethical goodness and sweetness of art, furthermore because the so-called scientific truth, creative beauty and ethical goodness. whereas the thing of epistemology is to question how one thing is coming back, how can we recognize,, how can we distinguish it from others, thus with regard to the circumstances of area and time on a matter.
Ontology could be a branch of philosophy that talking regarding and aren't certain by one specific embodiment. as an example within the philosophy of metaphysical philosophy. to look at the thing of ontology is that there aren't tied to 1 specific embodiment. Discusses the present ontologies are universally, ie attempting to search out a core that contained any reality that encompasses all of reality in all its forms. whereas that's a cornerstone within the level of ontology is what the thing is examined, how the essential type of the thing, how is that the relationship with the thing and capture the ability of human thought.
Axiology could be a term derived from Greek, that means Axios is suitable or honest, whereas logos suggests that science. Axiology is additionally known as the speculation of price. So, axiology is that the science that investigates the character of price. as an example in philosophy is that the philosophy of conduct or ethics and philosophy of beauty or aesthetics. Object of study of axiology is that the application of data, in order that is mentioned ranging from the classification, the aim of data and its development. which became the muse for what level of information axiology is it used? How will the employment of scientific knowledge with ethical ethics? How is that the determination of the studied object ethically? the way to link scientific procedures and scientific strategies with the moral rules?.
2. Characteristic of medieval philosophy is "Credo Ut Intelligam", who revealed the terms of this philosophy, and make a case for the that means of the expression.
According to Anselm (1033-1109), the ratio will be connected or used for matters concerning faith. That doesn't mean that the ratio alone may reach the reality of faith altogether. Conversely, faith or belief will facilitate ratio, that the confidence individuals can have a clearer understanding. the connection between the ratio of the faith is formulated with "Credo Ut In Telligam" (I believe so as to understand). the purpose is that folks who have spiritual beliefs can higher perceive everything from God, man, and also the world. thus her faith that takes precedence in his philosophy, however doesn't deny the power of the ratio.
3. Who offers a term in philosophy ie <> what those terms mean, and what lies behind the emergence of the term.
The term is employed by Rene Descartes who was initially troubled by the uncertainty of scholastic thought within the face of the results of positive science renaissance. Admitted flow refers to the Aristotelian plan assumes everything is affected, and have a tendency to be speculative superstition. clearly this claim is extremely contrary to Aristotle. as a result of the philosophy of Aristotle departed from 1st principles "concrete substance" a basic principle of the eternal conflict with the principle philosophy of "ideas" of Plato. Descartes is additionally troubled by the robust belief among the churches regarding doctrine Anselm that the fundamental philosophy is religion, credo ut intelligam. These anxieties provoked Descartes sought to search out a basis of "truth" a rational and systematic, not speculative, nor simply assured.
Because of that, he began his philosophy by doubting all things beforehand. The symptoms seem, he doubted all. he's skeptical regarding what he's captured through the senses. till he finally found a positive issue that he didn't doubt and may not be doubted by anyone, ie "I'm hesitant". "I'm hesitant" as a result of "I think". "I think" could be a truth as a result of there's little doubt anymore. "I think" is true, thus undoubtedly "there". If "I think" to "no", then the conclusion "I suppose, thus I exist". Cogito ergo add.
Doubt that Descartes known as the "universal methodical doubt". Purpose the word "doubt" here isn't within the sense of endless confusion, however questioned the re-performance of the intellect. "Doubt" is practiced because the 1st step towards certainty, encompass the correct from wrong, and paved the approach certainty of chance. Doubts additionally referred to as "methodical" due to "doubts" could be a approach of uncovering the reality is reflective reasoning-radical-philosophical. The journey to the reality of this could be extended indefinitely till the doubt confine myself to search out the peace of mind that "absolutely certain" and "definitely true". Therefore, methodical doubt, Descartes said, ought to be "universal".
4. Tell concept of Philosophy by Rene Descartes tree and provides explanations of the concept of the Tree That philosophy, furthermore as whether or not the theories of Rene Descartes threaten the Church at that point. make a case for your argument.
Encounter of philosophy and arithmetic that they are doing, in line with Descartes is an argument regarding the philosophy of science, where it's likened to a tree sort of a philosophy. Logic as its trunk, and science as a root. Science is taken from its original that means refers to any "knowledge" which will be verified, not solely on the sort of data is patterned on the strategies of physical science. Like all branches of the trees that grow from the stem, all information can even be expressed through the words (logoi). may be added that the tree bark as analytic logic (shows the surface protecting ways that of thinking) and core logic tree as artificial (bringing to mind management and also the lifetime of the mind itself).
The leaves of the tree will be likened to the sphere of philosophical inquiry that is typically referred to as ontology (the study of being). whereas the fruit is taken into account because the place to begin of the varied sciences. When the fruit falls to the bottom, rot, and then rooted in order that there arose a replacement tree of data that's specific. however this tree is simpler, when it reaches maturity is usually threatening to the existence of its parent. If new trees growing from the tree of philosophy is that the specific sciences, then the seeds obtained in every fruit that symbolizes a plan or insight. And soil as a convention.
Yeah, as a result of Descartes instructed we must always go not with confidence, however with doubt. this is often fully opposite of the angle of St. Augustine, and customarily the center of the century theologians that religion should return 1st. it's true that Descartes then went on and came to the conclusion that orthodox theology, however his readers are additional interested and additional responsive to the tactic developed than kongklusi that he pulled. Finally, the concern among the churches of the writings of Descartes which might be the danger arises.
Clearly illustrated in his writings, Descartes an unwavering belief within the existence of God. He considers himself an obedient Catholic, however Catholic church didn't like his views, and his work is assessed into the "index" forbidden books to scan. Even in Protestant Holland (then in all probability the foremost tolerant country in Europe), Descartes was accused of an atheist and having bother with the authorities.
5. Why 3 characters particularly philosophy of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle's philosophical ideas higher known within the golden age of Greek philosophy. make a case for your opinion and analysis.
Because they live within the golden age and their thoughts were terribly affecting. and also the strategies they used were meant to answer the question at the time, thus it's not wrong if their thoughts known on the golden age of Greek philosophy.
Socrates was known for his contribution within the field of education, at the time of the sophists (teachers) when hawking his information was asked in come. thus Socrates with bringing forth a replacement methodology is that the methodology of inquiry referred to as the tactic of elenchos, that are widely applied to check the fundamental ethical concept. As a student, Socrates is thought for his skills in speaking and thinking talents. it's additionally known for having the ability to elucidate the thought of systematically for learning regarding the natural balance of the atmosphere, which can then cause the event of scientific methodology. Not solely that dialectical-critical methodology (dialectic) Socrates is in a position to defeat the Sophists of the time within the several debates that they are doing additionally the tactic is meant to cure the chaos that occurred within the arena of philosophy posed by the Sophists.
As Socrates, Plato is legendary for his philosophical methodology of dialogue that reinforces the opinion of his teacher (Socrates). the foremost vital contribution is regarding ideas regarding ideas. Even so, it doesn't mean others aren't vital. Therefore, the notion that ideas related to Plato's ideas of others. the thought looks to still have relevance, 'Elen very important modern and in line with current thinking.
In the world of philosophy, Aristotle referred to as the daddy of Logic. The logic is named ancient logic as a result of it'll later be converted into fashionable logic. Aristotelian logic is additionally typically known as "formal logic". If the Sophists many folks who suppose humans won't be able to get the reality, within the Metaphysics Aristotle states that humans will get the reality. when put next with Plato whose views are additional inclined to abstract aspects and idealism, whereas Aristotle is additional on things that are concrete (empiricism).
No comments:
Post a Comment